Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma clarified that there have been no discussions within the state government regarding Article 371 of the Indian Constitution.
He made this statement in response to a query raised by North Shillong MLA Adelbert Nongrum during the Assembly session today.
Sangma emphasized that Meghalaya falls under the Sixth Schedule, which grants significant autonomy to the Autonomous District Councils (ADCs) in legislative, judicial, and executive matters. In contrast, Article 371 varies across states and does not provide such powers. He cited Maharashtra and Gujarat, where Article 371 only allows the Governor to establish Development Boards and allocate funds, without addressing legislative powers.
The Chief Minister stated that while Article 371 is relevant for Nagaland, it is not a pressing requirement for Meghalaya. However, he assured that the government would examine the matter.
It may be recalled that Nongkrem MLA Ardent Miller Basaiawmoit had previously raised this issue in the Assembly, but the House had rejected the proposal outright.
During the discussion, MLA Adelbert Nongrum argued that implementing Article 371 in Meghalaya could provide safeguards against laws such as the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and other central legislations. However, Sangma reaffirmed that the state government would oppose the UCC if it undermines indigenous customs, rights, and cultural identity. He also pointed out that the UCC passed in Uttarakhand exempts tribals, which necessitates further deliberation.
Leader of the Opposition, Dr. Mukul Sangma, highlighted the strengthening of the Sixth Schedule through proposed amendments, which have transferred several state subjects to the ADCs. He stressed the need to restore Paragraphs 12A and 12B to ensure that laws passed by the district councils are not subject to state government intervention.
